Download >>> https://byltly.com/281s4b
university education in danger. Unsalable syllabus. The latest trend among colleges and universities is to reduce the length of the academic syllabus, which has led to a steep decline in enrollment rates. Other than this, there doesn't seem to be a problem with the quality of education these institutions offer, as evidenced by their recent rankings and reputation metrics. The question now is how will students be able not only to receive a quality education but also afford it? Will they have to resort to looking for alternative options that are less cumbersome? These questions are part of a larger problem plaguing higher education—a student loan crisis. With nearly 70 percent of the student population at Kerala colleges and more than 72 percent of them repaying loans, there is no denying the fact that this crisis has become endemic to these institutions. The situation is so critical that many college authorities are starting to consider making drastic changes in their curriculums under the pressure of this crisis. For example, a couple of years ago a college principal reduced a course from four semesters to three by eliminating one semester. This issue has been addressed by the Unsaha committee under the chairmanship of Dr. P.S.U. Zachariah, a retired professor of economics from the University of Calicut. In the recommendations of his committee, they have suggested that universities and colleges should have various priorities in their syllabus. These priorities include: In order to satisfy the needs of the students, these curriculums should be designed in a way that provides a variety of options with a shorter duration of study at one go. This would mean cutting down on some courses and adding new courses to make room for these additional options in order to give students adequate choices when choosing their courses. This has been suggested by the committee, in order to ensure that students can pursue their higher education effectively and conveniently. Also, this is necessary in order to give them the option of reducing the time they spend for their studies. The Unsaha committee made a decision that the central board of accreditation should be a more proactive authority, and that it should have a more active role in enforcing the regulations set by the committee. This means that this board will play an active role in monitoring and preventing any wrongdoings by colleges and universities. In order to maximize the efficiency of this board's actions, they will enforce strict regulations on academic institutions with regard to granting promotion to their employees. In addition, they will issue promotions only after providing evidence of satisfactory performance by these employees rather than after a particular period of time spent on their job. cfa1e77820
Comments